Revision of the uncemented hip prosthesis

Large femoral bone loss after hip revision using the uncemented proximally porous-coated Bi-Metric prosthesis

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Periprosthetic bone loss after uncemented femoral hip revision is a matter of concern. We have used a proximally porous- and hydroxyapatite-coated prosthesis (Bi-Metric) in revision since 1989 and now we report the bone changes. This prosthesis is intended to distribute the forces more evenly and to avoid proximal femoral unloading. METHODS 22 patients were unilaterally...

Cemented versus uncemented femoral components in the ring hip prosthesis.

A prospective, randomised and independently assessed trial of the Ring UPM total hip replacement showed that the quality of the early result was better if the femoral prosthesis was cemented than if it was not. More patients with cemented prostheses were painfree at four months (58% cemented:42% uncemented) and at one year (63% cemented:50% uncemented), but at two years pain relief was equal in...

Hip prosthesis introduction and early revision risk

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Little is known about the effect of the learning curve for different types of total hip arthroplasties (THAs). We investigated the prostheses survival of THAs just after the implementation of a model new to the hospital, and compared these results with the results of THAs done when more than 100 implantations had been undertaken. In addition, we investigated whether diffe...

Two-stage uncemented revision hip arthroplasty for infection.

We treated 50 consecutive patients with infected total hip arthroplasties according to a standard protocol. Previous surgery to eradicate the infection had been attempted in 13 patients and discharging sinuses were present in 20. Aspiration arthrography was routinely carried out before our interventions. The first stage was a meticulous removal of all foreign and potentially infected material. ...

Uncemented Hip Arthroplasty in Primary and Revision Surgery